Exhibit 10.8
ILLINOIS
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
January 26, 2007
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,
Complainant,
v.
MIDWEST GRAIN PRODUCTS OF ILLINOIS, INC., an Illinois corporation,
Respondent. |
) |
PCB 97-179 (Enforcement Air) |
|
|
|
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by T.E. Johnson):
On April 7, 1997, the Office of the Attorney General, on behalf of the People of the State of Illinois (People), filed a complaint against Midwest Grain Products of Illinois, Inc., an Illinois corporation (Midwest), (415 ILCS 5/31(c)(1) (2004)); 35 Ill. Adm. Code 103.204. The complaint concerns a Midwest facility located at South Front Street and Distillery, Pekin, Tazwell County that produces ethyl alcohol for beverages and industrial purposes, anhydrous fuel alcohol, wheat gluten and distillers feed.
In the complaint, the People allege that Midwest violated Section 9(a) and (b), and 9 .1 (d) of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act (Act) (415 ILCS 5/9(a),(b), and 9.1(d) (2004)); Section 165 of the Clean Air Act, 40 C.F.R. 52 .210); 35 Ill . Adm. Code 201.141 and 201.143; and Permit Condition 1 b(l) of Construction Permit #93020061 and Standard Condition 3 of Construction Permit #93020061 and Construction Permit #93080045. The People further allege that Midwest violated these provisions by (1) by failing to conduct the requisite best available control technology (BACT) analysis, install BACT level control, and apply for and obtain a construction permit prior to constructing two feed dryers resulting in a major modification at a major stationary source; (2) by discharging into the environment emissions in excess of permitted emission limitations; (3) by failing to operate the secondary scrubbers and failing to modify its construction permit; (4) by operating feed dryers #651 and #661 in excess of permitted emission limitations, and by continuing to operate the same dryers without secondary scrubbers; and (5) by operating dryer #651 and dryer #661 without first obtaining an operating permit issued by the Agency.
On November 16, 2006, the People and Midwest filed a stipulation and proposed settlement, accompanied by a request for relief from the hearing requirement of Section 31(c)(1) of the Act. 415 ILCS 5131(c)(1) (2004). These filings are authorized by Section 31(c)(2) of the Act. 415 ILCS 5/31(c)(2) (2004). See 35 Ill. Adm. Code 103.300(a). Under the proposed stipulation, Midwest does not affirmatively admit the violations alleged in the complaint, but agrees to pay a civil penalty of $200,000, and contribute $300,000 to Agencys Special Projects Fund.
The Board provided notice of the stipulations, proposed settlements, and requests for relief from hearing. The Board published newspaper notice in the Pekin Daily Times on December 21, 2006. The Board did not receive any requests for hearing. The Board grants the parties request for relief from the hearing requirement. See 415 ILCS 5/31(c)(2) (2004); 35 Ill. Adm. Code 103.300(b).
Section 103.302 of the Boards procedural rules sets forth the required contents of stipulations and proposed settlements. 35 Ill. Adm. Code 103.302. These requirements include stipulating to facts on the nature, extent, and causes of the alleged violations and the nature of the respondents operations. Section 103.302 also requires that the parties stipulate to facts called for by Section 33(c) of the Act (415 ILCS 5/33(c) (2004)), which bears on the reasonableness of the circumstances surrounding the alleged violations.
As previously stated, Midwest does not affirmatively admit the violations alleged in the complaint, but agrees to pay a civil penalty of $200,000, and contribute $300,000 to Agencys Special Projects Fund. The stipulation addresses the factors of Section 42(h) of the Act (415 ILCS 5/42(h) (2004), as amended by P.A. 93-575, (eff. Jan. 1, 2004), which may mitigate or aggravate the civil penalty amount. The People determined that a settlement amount of $500,000 is appropriate.
The People and Midwest have satisfied Section 103.302. The Board accepts the stipulation and proposed settlement.
This opinion constitutes the Boards findings of fact and conclusions of law.
ORDER
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Fiscal Services Section
1021 North Grand Avenue East
2
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Fiscal Services Section
1021 North Grand Avenue East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
Jane E. McBride
Assistant Attorney General
Environmental Bureau
500 South Second Street
Springfield, Illinois 62702
Dennis Brown
Assistant Counsel
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
1021 North Grand Avenue East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Section 41(a) of the Environmental Protection Act provides that final Board orders may be appealed directly to the Illinois Appellate Court within 35 days after the Board serves the order. 415 ILCS 5/41(a) (2004); see also 35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.300(d)(2), 101.906, 102.706. Illinois Supreme Court Rule 335 establishes filing requirements that apply when the Illinois Appellate Court, by statute, directly reviews administrative orders. 172 Ill. 2d R. 335. The Boards procedural rules provide that motions for the Board to reconsider or modify its final orders may be filed with the Board within 35 days after the order is received. 35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.520; see also 35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.902, 102.700, 102.702.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, certify that the Board adopted the above order on January 26, 2007, by a vote of 4-0.
/s/ Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
4