Document

We are distributing our proxy materials to our stockholders primarily via the Internet under the “Notice and Access” rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). This approach saves printing and mailing costs and reduces the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting, while providing a convenient way to access the materials and vote. On April 13, 2022 we are mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to stockholders of record at the close of business on March 28, 2022, containing instructions about how to access our proxy materials and vote online or vote by telephone.

We are providing this proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) to you on the Internet, or upon your request, have delivered a printed version of this Proxy Statement to you by mailing in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of MGP Ingredients, Inc. (the “Company”) of proxies to be voted at our Annual Meeting of stockholders to be held on May 26, 2022 (including any adjournment or postponement thereof).

Pursuant to rules adopted by the SEC, we use the Internet as the primary means of furnishing proxy materials to stockholders. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to our stockholders. All stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice or request a printed set of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or how to request a printed copy may be found in the Notice. In addition, stockholders may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis. We encourage stockholders to take advantage of the availability of the proxy materials on the Internet to help reduce the environmental impact of our annual meetings, and reduce the cost to the Company associated with the physical printing and mailing of materials.

Stock Held Through a Broker or Other Nominee. If your shares are held in a brokerage account at a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or similar organization, then you are the “beneficial owner” of shares held in “street name,” and a Notice was forwarded to you by that organization. The organization holding your account is considered the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to instruct that organization on how to vote your shares. Those instructions are contained in a “voting instruction form.” If you request printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you will receive a voting instruction form. If you are a beneficial owner and you want to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, you should contact your broker, bank or other nominee as soon as possible so that you can be provided with a control number to gain access to the online meeting.

If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name and do not provide the organization that holds your shares with specific voting instructions, then, under applicable rules, the organization that holds your shares may generally vote on “routine” matters but cannot vote on “non-routine” matters. The only routine matter for which your broker will be permitted to vote on your behalf without your instructions is the proposal related to the selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2022. If the organization that holds your shares does not receive instructions from you on how to vote your shares on a non-routine matter, that organization will inform the inspector of election that it does not have the authority to vote on that matter with respect to your shares. This is generally referred to as a “broker non-vote.”

To join the online Annual Meeting, login at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MGPI2022. You will need your unique 16-digit control number, which is included on the Notice or proxy card you received. If your shares are in "street name," you will need to contact your broker, bank or other nominee as soon as possible so that you can be provided with a control number to gain access to the online meeting.

The live audio of the webcast of the Annual Meeting will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time. Online access to the audio webcast will open approximately 30 minutes prior to the start of the meeting to allow time for the stockholders to log in and test the computer audio system. We encourage you to log in prior to the meeting start time. Beginning 30 minutes prior to the start of and during the online Annual Meeting, we will have a support team ready to assist stockholders with any technical difficulties they might have accessing or hearing the audio webcast of the meeting. If you encounter technical difficulties accessing the audio webcast, please call our support team at 800-586-1548 (U.S.) or 303-562-9288 (International).

We expect that all of our directors and executive officers, as well as representatives of KPMG LLP, will attend the online Annual Meeting and be available to answer questions. We will provide our stockholders the opportunity to ask questions and make statements about a proposal during the formal business of the meeting. Questions and comments of a general nature will be held until after the conclusion of the formal business of the meeting. Instruction for submitting questions and making statements will be posted on the virtual annual meeting website. The Rules of Conduct governing the live question and answer session will be posted on our investor relations website prior to the date of the Annual Meeting and may include certain procedural requirements, such as limiting repetitive or follow-up questions, so that more stockholders will have time to ask questions. Out of consideration for the other stockholders, we request that stockholders limit questions and comments to a time of two minutes or less.

The holders of record of the Company’s common stock, no par value (“Common Stock”), and the Company’s preferred stock, $10 par value (“Preferred Stock”), at the close of business on March 28, 2022 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of March 28, 2022, there were 21,983,766 shares of Common Stock outstanding and 437 shares of Preferred Stock outstanding. You are entitled to one vote for each share owned of record on that date.

Quorum. For the stockholders to approve proposals at the 2022 Annual Meeting, we must have a quorum. A quorum means the holders of a majority of the shares of each class of MGP stock outstanding on the record date are present at the Annual Meeting. Proxies received but marked as abstentions or treated as broker non-votes will be included in the calculation of the number of shares considered to be present at the meeting. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker has not received directions from customers and does not have discretionary authority to vote the customers’ shares on a non-routine matter. If a quorum is not present at the scheduled time of the meeting, the stockholders who are represented may adjourn the meeting until a quorum is present. The time and place of the adjourned meeting will be announced at the time the adjournment is taken, and no other notice will be given.

Proposal 1 – Elect Nine (9) Directors. Election of Group A directors is determined by a majority of votes cast (meaning the number of shares voted "for" a nominee must exceed the number of shares voted "against" such nominee). If any nominee for Group A director receives a greater number of votes "against" his or her election than votes "for" such election, our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that such person must promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board following certification of the vote. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast for the foregoing purpose, and will have no effect on the election of Group A nominees. Holders of Common Stock are entitled to vote on the election of the Group A directors only. Election of Group B directors is determined by a plurality vote (meaning the candidates for office who receive the highest number of votes of the class entitled to vote on such director position will be elected). Holders of Preferred Stock are entitled to vote on the election of the Group B directors only. Because it is a plurality vote, abstentions and withheld votes will have no effect on the election of Group B nominees. Broker non-votes are disregarded and will not affect the determination of a plurality.

Proposal 2 – Ratify the Appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. Ratification of KPMG LLP as MGP’s independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock and Preferred Stock of MGP that are entitled to vote and that are present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. Ratification of the independent registered public accounting firm is considered a routine matter and, accordingly, broker non-votes cannot occur.

Proposal 3 – Adopt an Advisory Resolution to Approve the Compensation of our Named Executive Officers. Adoption of the resolution (referred to as “Say-on-Pay”) requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock and Preferred Stock of MGP that are entitled to vote and that are present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. Broker non-votes will be treated as shares present for quorum purposes but not entitled to vote, so they will not affect the outcome of the vote on this proposal.

All other Proposals – All other proposals require the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of shares of Common Stock and a majority of shares of Preferred Stock entitled to vote that are present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. Brokers may vote on routine matters but cannot vote on non-routine matters.

The Board of Directors has nominated each of Neha J. Clark, David J. Colo, Thomas A. Gerke, Donn Lux, Lori L.S. Mingus, Kevin S. Rauckman, and Karen L. Seaberg, who serve as directors currently, and Todd B. Siwak, and Preet H. Michelson, who have not previously served as directors, for election as a director, to hold office until the Annual Meeting of stockholders to be held in 2023 and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal. Information regarding the director nominees is set forth below under the heading “Information Regarding Director Nominees.”

Voting Standard. Proxies will be voted in favor of Thomas A. Gerke, Donn Lux, Kevin S. Rauckman, and Todd B. Siwak for Group A directors, and Neha J. Clark, David J. Colo, Lori L.S. Mingus, Karen L. Seaberg, and Preet H. Michelson for Group B directors unless other instructions are given. Holders of Common Stock are entitled to vote on the election of the Group A directors only and holders of Preferred Stock are entitled to vote on the election of the Group B directors only. Group A directors are elected by a majority of votes cast. Abstentions and broker non-votes are disregarded in determining the outcome of the vote. Group B directors are elected by a plurality of votes of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors and the nominees who receive the most votes will be elected. Votes may be cast in favor of a director or withheld. Withheld votes and broker non-votes are disregarded in determining a plurality.

The Board of Directors, upon recommendation of its Audit Committee, recommends that you ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit the books, records and accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries for the year ending December 31, 2022. A representative of KPMG LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Information regarding the aggregate fees billed by KPMG LLP for the years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 for (i) professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and the reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s reports on Form 10-Q during such year (“Audit Fees”), (ii) assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company financial statements but are not included in Audit Fees, (iii) professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice or tax planning, and (iv) other products and services is reported below under the heading “Audit and Certain Other Fees Paid Accountants.”

Voting Standard. For the ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2022, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Preferred Stock and of the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock, present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the meeting, is required. Abstentions with respect to the vote on ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) provides that the Company’s stockholders have the opportunity to vote to approve, on an advisory (nonbinding) basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) rules. Pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Company is presenting the following “say-on-pay” proposal, which gives stockholders the opportunity to approve or not approve the Company’s compensation program for named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, by voting for or against the resolution set out below. While our Board intends to carefully consider the stockholder vote resulting from this proposal, the final vote is advisory in nature and will not be binding on the Company.

The Board and the Company’s Human Resources and Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders, and to the extent there is any significant vote against the named executive officer compensation as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, the Company, the Board and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee will consider the results of the vote in future compensation deliberations.

In addition to the advisory vote on executive compensation, the Dodd-Frank Act requires that stockholders have the opportunity to vote on how often they believe the advisory vote on executive compensation should be held in the future. The Dodd-Frank Act requires that stockholders have such opportunity to vote on the frequency of say-on-pay votes every six years after the initial vote. The Company held the initial frequency vote at the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, where the stockholders voted for holding a say-on-pay vote every year. The Company held the most recent frequency vote at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, where the stockholders voted for holding a say-on-pay vote every year. The next frequency vote will occur at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and the next say-on-pay vote will occur at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Voting Standard. For the advisory vote seeking approval of a resolution to approve named executive officer compensation, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Preferred Stock and of the holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock, voting as separate classes, present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the meeting, is required. Abstentions with respect to the advisory vote on the approval of a resolution to approve named executive officer compensation will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. Broker non-votes will be treated as shares present for quorum purposes but not entitled to vote, so they will not affect the outcome of the vote on this proposal.

Board Nominees

Age1

Class of Director2

Dates of Service on MGP Board

Current Service on MGP Board Committees

David J. Colo

Group B

August 2015-present

None

Lori L.S. Mingus

Group B

June 2020 - present

Human Resources and Compensation
Nominating and Governance

Karen L. Seaberg

Board Chairman

Group B

August 2009-present
Chairman from December 2014-present

Human Resources and Compensation
Nominating and Governance

Neha J. Clark

Group B

June 2021-present

Audit
Human Resources and Compensation
Nominating and Governance

Thomas A. Gerke

Human Resources and Compensation Committee Chairman

Group A

June 2021-present

Audit
Human Resources and Compensation
Nominating and Governance

Donn Lux

Group A

June 2021-present

None

Kevin S. Rauckman

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairman

Group A

June 2021-present

Audit
Human Resources and Compensation
Nominating and Governance

Preet H. Michelson

Group B

No prior service

None

Todd B. Siwak

Group A

No prior service

None

Pursuant to a Shareholders’ Agreement dated April 1, 2021 among the Company, Karen Seaberg, Lori Mingus, and the former shareholders of Luxco, Inc. (the "Luxco Sellers"), the Luxco Sellers have the right to nominate (i) two directors to the Company’s board of directors for so long as they continue to own at least 15% of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock, and (ii) one director to the Company’s board of directors for so long as they continue to own at least 10% but less than 15% of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock. Karen Seaberg and Lori Mingus have agreed to vote all of the shares of Common Stock that they beneficially own in favor of the election of the Luxco Sellers’ director nominees. The Luxco Sellers currently own approximately 23% of the Company's outstanding shares of Common Stock and they have nominated Donn Lux and Todd Siwak as directors.

Mr. Colo has been the Company’s Chief Executive Officer since May 2020 and the President since March 2020. He also served as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer from March 2020 to May 2020. Prior to joining the Company, he served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of SunOpta, Inc. from February 2017 to March 2019. He served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Diamond Foods, Inc. from 2013 until March 2016. He joined Diamond Foods in 2012 as Executive Vice President of Global Operations and Supply Chain. For the three years prior to joining Diamond Foods, Mr. Colo served as an independent industry consultant focusing on organizational optimization and planning. From 2003 to 2005, he served as President of ConAgra Food Ingredients. Before his employment at ConAgra Foods, Mr. Colo spent several years with Nestle-Purina Pet Care Company in roles of increasing responsibility, including Vice President of Supply for the company’s Golden Products Division, and Vice President of Store Brands and Venture Development. He also served two years as President of the American Dehydrated Onion and Garlic Association. The Company believes that Mr. Colo’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his extensive management experience and his experience in the food industry, and the sights he brings from his service as an officer of the Company.

Ms. Mingus’ career began in graphic design in 1996. She has worked as a designer for public companies, national associations and an advertising agency. She is a principal and owner of Torpa Design Co., specializing in all facets of graphic design, interior and exterior design since 2005. Ms. Mingus serves as a trustee on the Evan C. Cray Historical Museum. She serves as a Board member on the Cray Medical Research Organization at the University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas. In addition, she serves as a board member on the Atchison Amelia Earhart Foundation. The Company believes that Ms. Mingus’s qualifications to serve on the Board include her business and civic experience and organizational skills, her knowledge of the Company and the industries in which it operates, and her familiarity with the community in which the Company operates. Ms. Mingus is the daughter of Ms. Seaberg.

Ms. Seaberg is a member of the Heartland Chapter of National Association of Corporate Directors and the Kansas City Chapter of Women Corporate Directors (WCD). She was an executive travel agent and minority owner of Travel Center of Atchison for 31 years. Ms. Seaberg is active in civic affairs at both the local and national level. She was instrumental in the creation of Atchison’s Riverfront Park in 2004 and was the Kansas Governor’s Chair for the national Lewis and Clark Bicentennial Commemoration in 2002-2006, bringing one of 15 national events to Atchison, Leavenworth and Kansas City in 2004. She also served on the Lewis & Clark Trail Heritage Foundation board, a national not-for-profit based in Great Falls, MT, from 2003 to 2007 and as its national president from 2007 to 2008. Ms. Seaberg has been the chair of the annual Amelia Earhart Festival since 1997, which brings over 40,000 people to Atchison every year in July. Ms. Seaberg served on the Atchison Hospital Board from 1990 to 2004, and presently serves on the board of the Cray Medical Research Organization at the University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas. She also serves as a board member of the national Lewis and Clark Trust and is chair of the Atchison Amelia Earhart Foundation. In 2015, she was recipient of the Hall of Fame award from the Chamber of Commerce and the Vision of Excellence award from the Santa Fe Depot Trustees in Atchison, Kansas. The Company believes that Ms. Seaberg’s qualifications to serve on the Board include her business and civic experience and organizational skills, her knowledge of the Company and the industries in which it operates, her familiarity with the community in which the Company operates and her significant stock ownership. Ms. Seaberg is Ms. Mingus's mother.

Ms. Clark has been the Chief Financial Officer of Brunswick Boat Group, a division of Brunswick Corporation (NYSE: BC), a leading global designer, manufacturer, and marketer of recreational marine products, since March 2019. From August 2018 to November 2018, she was the Chief Financial Officer of Lifeway Foods, Inc. (Nasdaq: LWAY), a manufacturer and marketer of beverages and dairy products. From January 2016 to August 2018, she was the Chief Financial Officer of Coveris North American Food & Consumer Flexibles/Chief Transformation Officer of Coveris Americas, a leading producer of flexible packaging. From 1999 to 2015, she was employed by Kraft Foods, with increasing levels of responsibility, most recently as Director of Finance—Grocery Business. From 1997 to 1999, she was a senior auditor with Grant Thornton LLP. The Company believes that Ms. Clark’s qualifications to serve on the Board include her significant financial, accounting and public company leadership experience.

Mr. Gerke is a Senior Vice President and previously served as the General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer at H&R Block (NYSE: HRB), a global consumer tax services provider. Since joining H&R Block in January 2012, at various times Mr. Gerke has had additional responsibilities, including leadership of the human resources function and serving as interim Chief Executive Officer. From January 2011 to April 2011, Mr. Gerke served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of YRC Worldwide, a Fortune 500 transportation service provider. From July 2009 to December 2010, Mr. Gerke served as Executive Vice Chairman of CenturyLink, a Fortune 500 integrated communications business. From December 2007 to June 2009, he served as President and CEO at Embarq, then a Fortune 500 integrated communications business. He also held the position of Executive Vice President and General Counsel – Law and External Affairs at Embarq from May 2006 to December 2007. From October 1994 through May 2006, Mr. Gerke held a number of executive and legal positions with Sprint, serving as Executive Vice President and General Counsel for over two years. Mr. Gerke was a member of the board of directors of Tallgrass Energy GP, LLC, which is the general partner of Tallgrass Energy, LP from August 2015 to April 2020. He is also a past member of the boards of directors of CenturyLink, Embarq, and the United States Telecom Association. In addition, he is a former member of the Rockhurst University Board of Trustees and The Greater Kansas City Local Investment Commission Board of Trustees. He currently serves as a board member of Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. (Nasdaq: CNSL), a leading broadband and business communications provider. The Company believes that Mr. Gerke’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his experience on the boards and as an executive of various other public companies.

Mr. Lux was President and Chief Executive Officer, from 1991 until March 2021, and Chairman, from 2010 until March 2021, of Luxco, Inc., a leading branded beverage and alcohol company that was acquired by the Company on April 1, 2021. He was also Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Limestone Branch Distillery, LLC from November 2014 until its acquisition by the Company on April 1, 2021, and of Lux Row Distillers LLC from February 2016 until its acquisition by the Company on April 1, 2021. Mr. Lux serves on the boards of the American Distilled Products Association, The National Alcohol Beverage Control Association (NABCA) Industry Advisory Committee, and the St. Louis Regional Business Council (RBC). His philanthropic activities include serving on the boards of Social Venture Partners, the University City Children’s Center and the Lux Family Foundation. The Company believes that Mr. Lux’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his leadership skills, his extensive expertise and experience in the beverage alcohol industry, his former role as CEO of Luxco, Inc., his management of the growth and development of multi-brand portfolios, and his significant stock ownership.

Mr. Rauckman is the owner of, and financial consultant for, Rauckman Advisors, LLC, where he has worked since November 2017. Mr. Rauckman served as the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Garmin Ltd. (Nasdaq: GRMN) from January 1999 until December 2014 before taking early retirement from that role. He was named CFO of the Year by the Kansas City Business Journal in 2008. Mr. Rauckman now serves as a board member and the Audit Committee Chairman of CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc. (Nasdaq: CFB), in a role has held since May 2016. He also serves as a board member and Audit Committee Chairman of JE Dunn Construction Group, a role he has held since January 2017, and on the board of Tesseract Ventures, LLC, a role he has held since December 2018. The Company believes that Mr. Rauckman’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his public company experience on the boards of other companies and his significant financial, corporate governance, leadership, operational, and strategic planning skills.

Preet H. Michelson has been the Chief People Officer of AHEAD, Inc. since March 2022. AHEAD builds platforms for digital business. Prior to joining AHEAD, she was employed by United Airlines from June 2019 to March 2022, most recently as Managing Director for President, Chief Human Resources Officer and Chief Customer Officer. From December 2015 until June 2019, she worked for Molson Coors/MillerCoors in several positions of increasing responsibility, most recently as Senior HR Commercial Lead/Director for MillerCoors US Marketing, US Chain Sales, CCOE. From 2012 to 2015, she was Vice President, Customer Experience and Organizational Effectiveness of The Y of Metropolitan Chicago. Prior to that, she was employed by Beam Global Spirits & Wine from 2010 to 2012, most recently as Director, Marketing Strategy. From 2005 to 2009, she served as Senior Manager, Strategy—Tropicana Beverages, of PepsiCo. From 2000 to 2005, she served as Director, Strategy, Planning & Analysis for the Chicago Tribune Company. From 1999 to 2000, she worked for Ernst & Young as a Manager in its Mergers and Acquisitions practice group. The Company believes that Ms. Michelson’s qualifications to serve on the Board include her background in strategy and marketing for multiple consumer brands, her overall experience in all aspects of human resources management, her alcohol beverage industry experience, and her leadership experience.

Mr. Siwak has been the Chief Business Officer for North America for the Ferrero Group, a global sweet snacking company, since September 2021. Prior to joining Ferrero, Mr. Siwak was the Chief Executive Officer of Ferrara Candy Company from April 2013 until September 2021. From April 2009 until March 2013 Mr. Siwak was an operating partner for L Catteron Partners, a consumer focused privacy equity group. From August 2005 until April 2007, Mr. Siwak was a founding partner of Mindseye Group, a private equity group. From December 1999 to August 2005, Mr. Siwak was the Chief Executive Officer of TRG Accessories, a manufacturer of luggage and travel gear. The Company believes that Mr. Siwak’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his extensive management experience, his experience in the food industry, and the management and growth and development of multi-brand portfolios.

The Board of Directors believes that a majority of the directors should be independent and has determined that the following directors are independent: Neha J. Clark, Anthony P. Foglio, Thomas A. Gerke, Lori L.S. Mingus, Kevin S. Rauckman, Karen L. Seaberg, and M. Jeannine Strandjord. The Board of Directors has also determined that Todd B. Siwak and Preet H. Michelson, nominees for director, are independent. In determining the independence of directors, the Board found that none of the independent directors has any material relationship with the Company other than as a director. In making these determinations, the Board considers all facts and circumstances as well as the standards defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of the Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC ("Nasdaq").

The Board's standing Committees include the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee, and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee. The current members of the Audit Committee are M. Jeannine Strandjord (Chair), Neha J. Clark, Anthony P. Foglio, Thomas A. Gerke, and Kevin S. Rauckman. The current members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are Kevin S. Rauckman (Chair), Neha J. Clark, Anthony P. Foglio, Thomas A. Gerke, Lori L.S. Mingus, M. Jeannine Strandjord, and Karen L. Seaberg. The current members of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee are Thomas A. Gerke (Chair), Neha J. Clark, Lori L.S. Mingus, Kevin S. Rauckman, M. Jeannine Strandjord, and Karen L. Seaberg.

The members of the Audit Committee are independent under the Nasdaq listing rules and meet the applicable independence requirements of Section 10A(m)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The members of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee are also determined independent under the Nasdaq listing rules and applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each director on the Committees is a “non-employee” director as defined in Rule 16b-3(b)(3) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The Board meets immediately after each Annual Meeting of the stockholders and may hold other regular and special meetings. The meetings are led by the Chairman of the Board. During 2021, the Board met fifteen times, the Audit Committee met eight times, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee met five times, and the Nominating and Governance Committee met four times. Each non-employee director attended more than 75% of the meetings of the Board and the Committees of which the director was a member.

The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling the Board’s oversight responsibilities with respect to the quality and integrity of the financial statements, financial reporting process, and systems of internal controls. The Audit Committee also assists the Board in monitoring the independence and performance of the independent registered public accountant and the internal audit department. It also reviews and makes recommendations with regard to the process involved in the Company’s implementation of its conflict of interest and business conduct policy, is responsible for establishing and monitoring compliance under the code of conduct applicable to the chief executive and financial officers, and oversees the Board’s risk management process. In connection with this work, the Committee engages in regular discussions of the Company’s risks with senior management, internal auditors, and external auditors, and annually reviews: (a) the adequacy of the Audit Committee’s written charter that has been adopted by the Board of Directors; (b) the independence and financial literacy of each member of the Audit Committee; (c) the plan for and scope of the annual audit; (d) the services and fees of the independent auditor; (e) certain matters relating to the independence of the independent auditor; (f) certain matters required to be discussed with the independent auditor relative to the quality of the Company’s accounting principles; (g) the audited financial statements and results of the annual audit; (h) recommendations of the independent auditor with respect to internal controls and other financial matters; (i) significant changes in accounting principles that are brought to the attention of the Committee; and (j) various other matters that are brought to the attention of the Committee.

The Board has determined that M. Jeannine Strandjord, Neha J. Clark, Anthony P. Foglio, Thomas A. Gerke, and Kevin S. Rauckman are independent, as independence for audit committees is defined in the applicable listing standards of the Nasdaq. The Board of Directors has determined that each of Neha J. Clark, Kevin S. Rauckman, and Thomas A. Gerke is an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of SEC Regulation S-K. Under SEC regulations, a person who is determined to be an audit committee financial expert will not be deemed an “expert” for any purpose, including without limitation for purposes of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933. Further, the designation or identification of a person as an audit committee financial expert does not impose any duties, obligations, or liability on such person that are greater than the duties, obligations, or liability imposed on such person as a member of the audit committee and board of directors in the absence of such designation or identification and does not affect the duties, obligations, or liability of any other member of the audit committee or board of directors.

The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors and oversees the entire audit function including the selection of an independent registered public accounting firm. Management has the primary responsibility for the consolidated financial statements and the financial reporting process including internal control over financial reporting and the Company’s legal and regulatory compliance. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021. The Audit Committee also discussed with the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer their respective certifications with respect to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the matters as are required to be discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) including those matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees; has received the written disclosures and letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee; and has discussed with the independent auditor the auditor’s independence.

The Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Proxy Statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.

In identifying nominees for the Board of Directors, considers candidates for director who are recommended by its members, by other Board members, by management, as well as those identified by third-party search firms retained to assist in identifying and evaluating possible candidates. The Nominating and Governance Committee will also consider candidates recommended by stockholders in accordance with its policies and procedures. However, the Nominating and Governance Committee may choose not to consider an unsolicited candidate recommendation if no vacancy exists on the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee may, in its discretion, use an independent search firm to identify nominees.

Pursuant to a Shareholders’ Agreement dated April 1, 2021 among the Company, Karen Seaberg, Lori Mingus, and the former shareholders of Luxco, Inc. (the "Luxco Sellers"), the Luxco Sellers have the right to nominate (i) two directors to the Company’s board of directors for so long as they continue to own at least 15% of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock, and (ii) one director to the Company’s board of directors for so long as they continue to own at least 10% but less than 15% of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock. Karen Seaberg and Lori Mingus have agreed to vote all of the shares of Common Stock that they beneficially own in favor of the election of the Luxco Sellers’ director nominees. The Luxco Sellers currently own approximately 23% of the Company's outstanding shares of Common Stock, and they have nominated Donn Lux and Todd B. Siwak as directors.

The retirement of M. Jeannine Strandjord and Anthony Foglio resulted in two board seats to be filled by new director nominees. One of the Group A board seats will be filled by Mr. Siwak as discussed in the section entitled "Board of Directors". The Nominating and Governance Committee retained an outside search firm to identify candidates for the final board seat. The Nominating and Governance Committee, with the assistance of the outside search firm, and input from our independent directors and CEO, has nominated Preet H. Michelson for election to the Board as a Group B director.

The Nominating and Governance Committee believes that each candidate for the Board should be a person known for his or her integrity and honesty. Although the Committee does not have a formal policy with regard to diversity in identifying candidates, it looks for education, experience, knowledge or skills that complement those of existing members and that may be helpful to the Board in exercising its oversight responsibilities, as well as considering other self-identified diversity characteristics of the nominees. A sufficient number of Board members must meet the tests for independence set forth in the applicable listing standards of the Nasdaq and Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, to permit the Company to satisfy applicable Nasdaq and legal requirements. The Committee also believes it is desirable for at least one Board member to be an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined in Rule 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K. In considering candidates, the Committee may take into account other factors as it deems relevant.

In evaluating potential nominees, the Nominating and Governance Committee determines whether the nominee is eligible and qualified for service on the Board of Directors by evaluating the candidate under the selection criteria set forth above. The Nominating and Governance Committee will conduct a check of the individual’s background and generally will conduct personal interviews before recommending any candidate to the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee in its sole discretion may require candidates (including a stockholder’s recommended candidate) to complete a form of questionnaire providing information required to be disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement.

Stockholders who wish to recommend candidates for consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee in connection with next year’s Annual Meeting should submit the candidate’s name and the information set forth below in writing to the chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee, in care of the Company’s Secretary, at Cray Business Plaza, 100 Commercial Street, P.O. Box 130, Atchison, Kansas, 66002, on or after January 26, 2023 or before February 25, 2023. In addition to the name of the candidate, a stockholder should submit:

The Human Resources and Compensation Committee reviews and approves the salary and incentive compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers of the Company as well as director compensation and benefits. The Committee reviews the scope and type of compensation plans for other management personnel and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to equity-based plans that are subject to Board approval. The Committee administers the Company’s stock option and restricted stock plans, and also serves as an executive search committee. Each Committee member qualifies as a non-employee director under SEC Rule 16b-3. The Committee has a charter, which may be found on the Company’s website at www.mgpingredients.com.

The Committee typically meets four or five times a year and generally considers and recommends various components of the Company’s compensation programs at regularly scheduled times throughout the year. Such programs typically originate as recommendations of management. It has typically conducted performance and salary reviews of the Chief Executive Officer and receives the Chief Executive Officer’s performance reviews and salary recommendations for other officers at its December meeting. It generally considers long-term incentive awards and performance goals for short-term cash incentives in February.

Our Board does not have a policy regarding the separation of the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. The Board believes it is in the best interest of the Company to make that determination in a manner it believes best provides appropriate leadership for the Company at the time, based on the circumstances and direction of the Company and the membership of the Board. Our current structure does not combine the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, the latter also acting in the capacity of lead independent director. David J. Colo is currently our Chief Executive Officer and is responsible for day-to-day leadership of the Company. Karen L. Seaberg serves as the Chairman of the Board. The Board of Directors believes this is the most appropriate structure for the Company at this time, as it permits the Chief Executive Officer to focus his attention on managing our day-to-day business and enhances the ability of the Board of Directors to provide strong oversight of the Company’s management and affairs.

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Nominating and Governance Committee seeks a wide array of skills, knowledge and diverse backgrounds and perspectives, and takes those into account when evaluating the composition of our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors currently includes four women and one ethnic minority and directors ranging in age from 46 to 76. Our nominees for director include four women and two ethnic minorities and directors ranging in age from 46 to 74. In addition, each director contributes to the Board’s overall diversity by providing a variety of perspectives based on distinct personal and professional experiences and backgrounds. We are committed to maintaining and enhancing the diversity of backgrounds and experiences of our board of directors and, in furtherance of this, the Board and the Nominating and Governance Committee conduct annual self-evaluations to assess their performance and effectiveness, including consideration of the array of skills, knowledge and diverse backgrounds and perspectives on the Board.


Part I: Gender Identity	Female	Male	Non-Binary	Decline to Disclose
Directors (9 total)	4	5	—	—
Part II: Demographic Background	Female	Male	Non-Binary	Decline to Disclose
African American or Black	—	—	—	—
Alaska Native or Native American	—	—	—	—
Asian	1	—	—	—
Hispanic or Latinx	—	—	—	—
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander	—	—	—	—
White	3	5	—	—
Two or More Races or Ethnicities	—	—	—	—
LGBTQ+	—	—	—	—

This discussion provides an overview and analysis of our compensation programs and policies, the compensation decisions we made under those programs and policies, and the factors we considered in making those decisions. We also provide a series of tables that present information about the compensation earned or paid in each of 2019, 2020, and 2021 to our named executive officers, including:

Our compensation program objectives are to align compensation programs with our business objectives and stockholders’ interests, to reward performance, to be externally competitive and internally equitable, and to retain talent on a long-term basis. In particular, our philosophy is to balance salary and benefits with incentive and equity compensation so that the interests of the executive officers will be aligned with those of stockholders.

•Base salary is designed to attract and retain executives over time. In setting base salaries, our objectives are to assure internal fairness of pay in terms of job size, external competitiveness so that we can attract and retain needed talent, and a consistent, motivating system for administering compensation. Base salaries of named executive officers are reflected in the Salary column of the Summary Compensation Table.

•Short-term incentive awards are intended to focus executives on factors deemed critical to our profitability. By rewarding named executive officers for good performance, we believe we help align their interests with those of our stockholders. Such awards, when paid to named executive officers, are reflected in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table.

•Long-Term Incentives, which have in recent years been based on prior year performance and have been in the form of restricted stock units, are intended to motivate the achievement of key long-term financial performance goals and thereby generate stockholder value, provide management an opportunity to increase ownership of our stock, help attract and retain key employees, and be cost efficient. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee’s typical practice is to grant awards made with respect to a year as soon as practicable following the close of the year based on the performance during that year. In accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the reporting of stock awards, such awards are included in the Summary Compensation Table for the year in which they were made, rather than in the year to which they relate. The grant date fair values of awards, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, made during 2021, 2020, and 2019 to the named executive officers are shown in the Stock Awards column of the Summary Compensation Table. Awards made with respect to 2021 performance were made in early 2022, and are, therefore, not included in the Summary Compensation Table. Awards made with respect to 2020 were made in early 2021 and are included in the

•Non-Equity-Based Retirement Compensation, provided through our 401(k) plan and our non-qualified deferred compensation plan, permits employees to, among other things, reduce their current income taxes by making limited pre-tax contributions to increase, enhance and diversify their retirement savings. Named executive officers participate in the 401(k) plan on the same basis as other eligible employees. Amounts, if any, contributed by the Company under the 401(k) plan are included in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table. In 2018 the Company adopted a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for its executive officers. The deferred compensation plan permits participants to defer salary or short-term incentive payments. Amounts deferred are deemed invested in investments selected by the participant from a limited number of choices available in the Company's 401(k) plan. Mr. Gall and Mr. Glaser participated in the deferred compensation plan in 2021, and each deferred a portion of their short-term incentive paid in 2022 for 2021 performance.

As noted elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, our Human Resources and Compensation Committee reviews and approves the salary and incentive compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers of the Company. The Committee reviews the scope and type of compensation plans for other management personnel and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to equity-based plans that are subject to Board approval. The Chief Executive Officer provides the Committee with performance reviews and salary recommendations for other officers.

The Committee has unrestricted access to management. It may also request the participation of management or the Committee’s independent consultant at any meeting or executive session. Committee meetings are regularly attended by the Chief Executive Officer (except for executive sessions and discussions of his own compensation) and the Committee’s independent consultant. The Committee regularly reports to the Board on compensation matters and annually reviews the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation with the Board in an executive session of non-management directors only.

Base Salary. Our Vice President – Human Resources develops a summary of the titles and job descriptions of executive officers and submits them to a compensation consultant retained by the Committee, which maintains survey data for similar-sized manufacturing firms. A compensation consultant retained by the Committee prepares a report identifying the ranges of compensation at these companies for persons with similar responsibilities to those employees described in the company-prepared summary. In addition, annually we obtain from a retained compensation consultant updated information regarding average pay increases at the companies for which a retained compensation consultant maintains survey data. This survey information, or summaries thereof, is provided to the Human Resources and Compensation Committee. The Committee reviews this information and considers any recommendation made by the Chief Executive Officer with respect to other named executive officers. The Committee then targets for each officer’s base compensation a range that is within 80% to 120% of a specified percentile of salaries paid to executives holding comparable positions at the surveyed companies. Although the ultimate goal is to compensate executive officers at the midpoint of this targeted range for comparable positions at companies within the survey, a particular individual’s salary may fall above or below the targeted level because of his or her tenure, experience level, or performance. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee has approved the 50th percentile of the market as the target for base salaries.

When made, annual adjustments usually take place after the start of the next year, but are retroactive to the start of such year. When making annual adjustments, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee takes into account each executive’s performance review and the extent to which his or her salary is above or below the midpoint for comparable positions. Adjustments sometimes occur at other times of the year as a result of a promotion or other change in duties.

Incentive Compensation. We believe a significant portion of the compensation of senior managers should be incentive based, and that by rewarding good performance, such arrangements help align the interests of our named executive officers with those of our stockholders. The goal of our annual program is to closely align how we compensate employees with our business strategy. Specifically, we want to encourage employees to think about how they can contribute to driving Company profitability, reduce costs for goods and equipment, and create efficiencies to improve our ongoing operations. We reward them for success by basing short-term bonuses and long-term equity incentive awards on the attainment of performance metrics that correspond with the creation of shareholder value.

Short-Term Incentive Plan. The Company's Short-Term Incentive Plan (the “STI Plan”) is designed to motivate and retain Company officers and employees and to tie their short-term incentive compensation to achievement of certain profitability goals of the Company. Pursuant to the STI Plan, short-term incentive compensation is dependent on the achievement of certain performance metrics by the Company established by the Board of Directors and certain individual qualitative objectives. Each performance metric is calculated in accordance with the rules approved by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee. For 2021, such performance metrics were operating income, earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation ("EBITDA"), and earnings per share ("EPS"), each calculated as presented in the table below. Operating income was the core measure of performance under the STI Plan, reflecting the belief that this measure of performance is the most sensitive to management's performance. EBITDA is a common metric used by shareholders to measure performance and EPS reflects the Company's full financial performance. These quantitative goals represent 90% of the total short-term incentive. In addition, 10% of the total incentive was based on qualitative goals. Levels in the table below for operating income and EBITDA are shown in thousands. The performance metrics listed below include the impact of bonus payments made as a result of achievement of these metrics under the STI Plan.

The Human Resources and Compensation Committee determines the Chief Executive Officer's eligibility under the STI Program for the plan year and his target annual compensation. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee reviews and approves management's recommendation of the other officers and employees eligible to participate under the STI Program for the plan year as well as the target annual incentive compensation for each other participant for each plan year. For 2021, each of the named executive officers participated in the STI Plan and the target annual incentive opportunity for each of the named executive officers as a percentage of base salary was 100% for Mr. Colo, 60% for Mr. Gall, and 50% for Mr. Bratcher, Mr. Dykstra and Mr. Glaser.

For 2021, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee adjusted the Company's actual results to exclude certain acquisition-related fees and expenses, finished goods inventory step-up, and insurance proceeds received from the November 2020 dryer fire incident at our Atchison facility. The exclusion of these items, which were not anticipated when the performance targets were determined, reduced operating income and EBITDA by $4.9 million. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee determined that after reflecting this adjustment for purposes of the STI Plan, before factoring in the impact of bonus payments made as a result of the Company's performance, the Company achieved Operating Income of $133.7 million, EBITDA of $153.1 million and earnings per share of $4.68. As a result of this performance, and after giving effect to the qualitative portion of the STI Plan, in early 2022, Mr. Colo received a payment of $1,370,200, Mr. Gall received a payment of $450,000, Mr. Bratcher received a payment of $453,000, Mr. Dykstra received a payment of $332,690, and Mr. Glaser received a payment of $314,150.

Long-Term Incentive Plan. On May 22, 2014, stockholders approved the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the "LTI Plan"). The Board reserved 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance under the LTI Plan. The LTI Plan authorizes awards in the form of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, other stock-based awards and cash performance awards. The mix of long-term incentives going forward is expected to continue to be 100% in three-year cliff-vesting restricted stock unit awards. Each named executive officer’s participation level and performance metrics is subject to Human Resources and Compensation Committee discretion. For 2021, the performance metrics for the LTI Plan were the same as for the STI Plan discussed above. The long-term incentive opportunity for 2021 for the named executive officers as a percentage of base salary was 125% for Mr. Colo and 65% for Mr. Bratcher, Mr. Dykstra, Mr. Gall, and Mr. Glaser.

Retirement Compensation. We provide non-equity-based compensation through our 401(k) plan, a tax-qualified defined contribution plan. Our 401(k) plan allows a Company match of 1% for each 1% of employee deferral to a maximum of 6%. Named executive officers participate in the 401(k) plan on the same basis as other employees. Amounts contributed under the 401(k) plan have been allocated to participant accounts in proportion to each participant’s eligible compensation, as defined in the plan. In 2018 the Company adopted a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for its executive officers. The deferred compensation plan permits participants to defer salary or short-term incentive payments. Amounts deferred are deemed invested in investments selected by the participant from a limited number of choices available in the Company's 401(k) plan. Mr. Gall and Mr. Glaser participated in the deferred compensation plan in 2021, and deferred a portion of their short-term incentive award for 2021, which was paid in February 2022.

Executive Severance Plan. On February 12, 2020, the Company established the MGP Ingredients, Inc. Executive Severance Plan. The plan, as amended on December 14, 2021, provides the Company’s executive leadership team the opportunity to receive severance benefits in the event of certain terminations of employment, with the purpose to attract and retain qualified executives. Pursuant to the plan, upon a qualifying termination (generally, a termination by the Company without cause or a termination by the participant for good reason (each as defined in the plan)) then the participant would receive severance in an amount equal to an applicable severance multiplier (one for any participant who is not the chief executive officer and two for any participant who is the chief executive officer) times the participant’s base salary in effect immediately prior to the date of the termination. In addition, participants would receive a prorated annual bonus based on the Company’s actual performance in the year in which termination occurs. Participants are eligible for reimbursement for certain COBRA premiums for a limited period of time. The plan does not affect the terms of any outstanding equity awards. Any severance benefits payable to a participant under the plan would be reduced by any severance benefits to which the participant would otherwise be entitled under any other severance policy or plan, including any agreement between a participant and the Company (unless the plan or agreement expressly provides for severance benefits to be in addition to those provided under the plan).

Other Compensation Programs. We do not provide executive perquisites of any significance. We also do not have significant executive benefits, such as supplemental executive retirement plans. Mr. Colo receives an automobile allowance of $500 per month pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement. Mr. Bratcher receives an automobile allowance of $1,500 per month and a monthly gas allowance.

In connection with Mr. Colo’s appointment as an officer of the Company, initially as President and Chief Operating Officer effective March 16, 2020, and as Chief Executive Officer upon Mr. Griffin’s retirement, the Company and Mr. Colo entered into an employment agreement on February 7, 2020. The employment agreement sets forth Mr. Colo’s base salary, signing bonus, short-term incentive, and long-term incentive as follows:

Long-term Incentive. Mr. Colo is eligible to participate in the Company’s LTI Plan for each fiscal year during which he is employed under the terms of the employment agreement. The awards made under the LTI Plan in any given year will be for performance for the immediately preceding year pursuant to the LTI Plan. His employment agreement set out the terms for his award for 2020. For 2021 and future years, the terms and conditions of his participation in the LTI Plan are reviewed and established annually by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee.

Severance. Except in the event of a voluntary termination by Mr. Colo without good reason, termination by the Company with cause, or upon a termination at death or for disability, Mr. Colo will receive severance of (i) two times his base salary, (ii) pro-rata short-term incentive and long-term incentive awards based on actual performance for the full year in which the termination occurs, and (iii) the full-year short-term incentive and long-term incentive awards for any completed year unpaid as of the date of termination; provided, however, that a prior full year short-term incentive award is payable even in the event of a voluntary termination without good reason or a termination for cause. In addition, except in the event of a termination by the Company with cause, upon termination all outstanding restricted stock units that are then unvested will vest. Upon a termination for disability or death, Mr. Colo or his estate will receive severance of (i) one times his base salary, (ii) a pro-rata short-term incentive award based on actual performance for the full year in which the termination occurs and (iii) the full-year short-term incentive and long-term incentive awards for any completed year unpaid as of the date of termination.

Under the guidelines, our executive officers are required to achieve ownership of our Common Stock valued at two times their annual base salary (five times in the case of the Chief Executive Officer and two and a half times in the case of the Chief Financial Officer). The individual guideline level for each executive officer is initially calculated using the executive officer’s base salary as of the date the person is first appointed as an executive officer. This guideline level is then recalculated at each January 1st. Unless an executive officer has satisfied his or her applicable guideline level, the executive officer is required to retain an amount equal to 50% of the net shares received as the result of the exercise, vesting or payment of any equity awards granted to the executive officer. Executive officers are expected to be in compliance with their guideline level within five (5) years of the later of (a) becoming an executive officer and (b) implementation of this policy. As of January 1, 2022, with the exception of Mr. Colo, who was appointed to his position in 2020, Mr. Gall, who was appointed to his position in 2019, and Mr. Bratcher, who was appointed to his current position in 2021, each of the named executive officers has satisfied the ownership requirements. As of the date hereof, each of Messrs. Colo, Gall and Bratcher are progressing toward attaining the applicable ownership guideline.

Under the guidelines, the chairman of the Board is expected to beneficially own Common Stock valued at five times the annual cash retainer as a director and each other non-employee director is expected to beneficially own Common Stock valued at three times the annual cash retainer payable to such director. The guideline level is calculated using the annual cash retainer due the director when first elected to the Board. This guideline level is then recalculated at each January 1st. Non-employee directors are required to satisfy their guideline level within three (3) years of joining the Board, and are expected to continuously own sufficient shares to satisfy the guideline once attained for so long as they remain a member of the Company’s Board. All directors either own a sufficient number of shares of Common Stock to be in compliance with the guidelines or are in the three year phase-in period.

Shares that count toward satisfaction of the stock ownership guidelines for executive officers and directors include the following: (i) shares owned outright by the executive officer or director, or his or her immediate family members residing in the same household; (ii) shares held in trust for the benefit of the executive officer or director, or his or her immediate family members; (iii) vested shares of restricted stock; and (iv) vested shares of restricted stock units. The following do not count towards satisfaction of the stock ownership guidelines: (i) unvested shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units; (ii) shares pledged as collateral for a loan; (iii) unexercised stock options (whether vested or unvested); and (iv) incentive performance awards that may be settled in cash (whether vested or unvested).

We also have an insider trading policy that, among other things, prohibits directors and executive officers from entering into any hedging or monetization transactions or otherwise trading in any instrument relating to the future price of our securities, such as a put or call option, futures contract, short sale, collar or other derivative security. In addition, we prohibit pledging shares of our Common Stock as collateral by directors and executive officers. Exceptions to this restriction on pledging may be granted by the General Counsel under limited circumstances when the pledgor demonstrates the financial capacity to repay a loan without resorting to the pledged securities. As of the date hereof, no directors or executive officers had shares pledged. Other than the stock ownership guidelines described above, we do not have a policy regarding the length of time executives or directors have to hold their stock after exercise or vesting. Our code of conduct discourages short sales and trading in our stock on a short-term basis.

We do not expect accounting treatment of differing forms of equity awards to vary significantly and, therefore, accounting treatment is not expected to have a material effect on the selection of forms of compensation. Total expected compensation expense for each grant program is amortized over the vesting period of the awards. Compensation expense related to the restricted stock unit awards in 2021 and 2022 was based on market price of stock on the award dates.

•the Board determines in its sole discretion that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders for the participant to repay or forfeit all or any portion of the compensation. In this regard, compensation includes proceeds, gains or other economic benefit actually or constructively received by the participant upon receipt or exercise of an award or upon receipt of resale of any shares of stock underlying an award.

The following table shows the compensation that we paid for services rendered to us in all capacities to the persons who served as our principal executive officer (“PEO”), principal financial officer (“PFO”), and the three most highly-compensated executive officers serving as such at the end of 2021. The table also includes information for each such person during the years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 that he also was deemed a named executive officer.


Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)		Stock Awards ($)(1)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(2)		All Other Compensation ($)(3)		Total ($)
David J. Colo (a) (PEO)	2021	$	685,100	$	1,281,242	$	1,370,200	$	37,153	$	3,373,695
	2020	512,674		209,440		1,025,000		112,057		1,859,171
Brandon M. Gall (b)	2021	375,000		417,355		450,000		26,555		1,268,910
(PFO)	2020	315,000		247,213		385,269		25,388		972,870
	2019	256,692		235,787		20,280		17,450		530,209
David S. Bratcher (c)	2021	342,828		294,981		453,000		22,627		1,113,436
David E. Dykstra (d)	2021	332,690		427,965		332,690		25,579		1,118,924
	2020	323,000		30,268		329,212		24,787		707,267
	2019	315,000		192,816		19,374		22,839		550,029
Stephen J. Glaser (e)	2021	314,150		404,093		314,150		26,023		1,058,416
	2020	305,000		28,318		310,865		25,354		669,537
	2019	295,000		179,790		20,364		23,340		518,494

(1)The amount shown is the grant date fair value of awards made during the period computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Accelerated full or pro-rata vesting may be permitted upon a change of control or if employment is terminated as a result of death, disability, retirement or termination without cause. We pay dividend equivalents on these shares during the vesting period, which are not taken into account in determining their grant date fair value. Mr. Colo, Mr. Gall, Mr. Bratcher, Mr. Dykstra, and Mr. Glaser were granted Restricted Stock Units based on 2021 performance in 2022 in the amounts of $1,712,716, $487,525, $441,713, $432,535, and $408,423 respectively. These grants are not included in the table.

(2) Amounts due under the cash incentive payments for 2019 performance were made in the first quarter of 2020 and are reflected in the table above for 2019. Amounts due under the cash incentive payments for 2020 performance were made in the first quarter of 2021 and are reflected in the table above for 2020. Amounts due under the cash incentive payments for 2021 performance were made in the first quarter of 2022 and are reflected in the table above for 2021.

(3) Includes dividend equivalents paid on restricted stock unit awards in 2021 in the following amounts: Mr. Colo – $13,115; Mr. Gall - $7,656; Mr. Bratcher - $1,795; Mr. Dykstra - $4,709; and Mr. Glaser $4,428. Includes the Company’s contributions to the Company’s 401(k) plan allocated to the accounts of each named executive officer for 2021 in the following amounts: Mr. Colo - $17,400; Mr. Gall - $17,400; Mr. Bratcher - $3,996; Mr. Dykstra - $17,400; and Mr. Glaser- $17,400. Includes Company's contributions to premiums towards the purchase of additional life insurance for Mr. Gall, Mr. Dykstra, and Mr. Glaser. Includes an automobile allowance and payment of a gas allowance for Mr. Bratcher. Additionally, includes amount paid by the Company towards the purchase of life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment insurance, and long-term disability insurance.

The following table sets forth information with respect to each named executive officer concerning grants of awards during the year ended December 31, 2021, under both the Company’s equity and non-equity plans.


		Estimated future payouts under non-equity incentive plan awards						Estimated future payouts under equity incentive plan awards
Name	Grant date	Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Max ($)		Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Max ($)		All other stock awards: Number of shares of stock or units (#)	Grant date fair value of stock and option awards ($)
David J. Colo
LTI Opportunity	2/11/2021(1)							$	428,188	$	856,375	$	1,712,750
STI Opportunity	2/11/2021(2)	$	342,550	$	685,100	$	1,370,200
RSUs	2/11/2021(3)													19,322	$	1,281,242
Brandon M. Gall
LTI Opportunity	2/11/2021(1)							$	121,875	$	243,750	$	487,500
STI Opportunity	2/11/2021(2)	$	112,500	$	225,000	$	450,000
RSUs	2/11/2021(3)													6,294	$	417,355
David S. Bratcher
LTI Opportunity	4/1/2021(1)							$	110,429	$	220,857	$	441,713
STI Opportunity	4/1/2021(2)	$	113,250	$	226,500	$	453,000
RSUs	4/1/2021(3)													4,987	$	294,981
David E. Dykstra
LTI Opportunity	2/11/2021(1)							$	108,125	$	216,249	$	432,498
STI Opportunity	2/11/2021(2)	$	83,173	$	166,345	$	332,690
RSUs	2/11/2021(3)													6,454	$	427,965
Stephen J. Glaser
LTI Opportunity	2/11/2021(1)							$	102,099	$	204,198	$	408,396
STI Opportunity	2/11/2021(2)	$	78,538	$	157,075	$	314,150
RSUs	2/11/2021(3)													6,094	$	404,093

(1)The amounts reported under the Threshold, Target and Maximum columns in this table are the values of the possible incentive compensation awards calculated in accordance with the provisions set forth in the LTI Plan. The Threshold column reports the awards that would have been paid if 91% of the performance targets were met. If less than 91% of a performance target is met, no incentive award is paid with respect to that target. The Target column reports the awards that would have been paid if 100% of the performance targets were met and the Maximum column reports the amount that would have been paid if 109% of the performance targets were met and represents the maximum awards available under the plan regardless of the amount by which the performance targets are exceeded. The performance targets performance goals relate to both

quantitative and qualitative criteria. The award amounts are denominated in dollars but are payable in restricted stock units in the number of shares that the award equates to at the time of payout. In February 2022, each executive received an award of restricted stock units for 2021 that was the maximum award payable under the LTI Plan as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of Compensation – Incentive Compensation -- Long-Term Incentive Plan.”

(2)The amounts reported under the Threshold, Target and Maximum columns in this table are the possible incentive compensation awards calculated in accordance with the provisions set forth in the STI Plan. The Threshold column reports the awards that would have been paid if 91% of the performance targets were met. If less than 91% of a performance target is met, no incentive award is paid with respect to that target. The Target column reports the awards that would have been paid if 100% of the performance targets were met and the Maximum column reports the amount that would have been paid if 109% of the performance targets were met and represents the maximum awards available under the plan regardless of the amount by which the performance targets are exceeded. The performance targets performance goals relate to both quantitative and qualitative criteria. For 2021, each executive received an award amount that was the maximum award payable under the STI Plan as reported in the Summary Compensation Table.


Name	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)		Market Value Of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)
David J. Colo	8,000	(3)	$	679,920
	19,322	(4)	$	1,642,177
Brandon M. Gall	579	(1)	$	49,209
	720	(2)	$	61,193
	6,294	(4)	$	534,927
	2,500	(5)	$	212,475
	6,500	(7)	$	552,435
David S. Bratcher	4,987	(6)	$	423,845
David E. Dykstra	2,472	(1)	$	210,095
	884	(2)	$	75,131
	6,454	(4)	$	548,525
Stephen J. Glaser	2,305	(1)	$	195,902
	827	(2)	$	70,287
	6,094	(4)	$	517,929


Name	Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year	Registrant Contributions in Last Fiscal Year	Aggregate Earnings (Losses) in Last Fiscal Year	Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions	Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End
	($)(1)	($)	($)(2)	($)	($)(3)
David J. Colo	-	-	-	-	-
Brandon M. Gall	$138,750	-	$15,696	-	$178,332
David S. Bratcher	-	-	-	-	-
David E. Dykstra	-	-	-	-	-
Stephen J. Glaser	$260,745	-	$22,929	0	$489,998

(1) The executive contributions reported in this column relate to a deferral of a portion of their base salary and STI award for 2021 by Mr. Gall and Mr. Glaser and are reported in the Summary Compensation Table for 2021 in the "Salary" and "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" columns. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee certified the dollar amount of the STI award in February 2022. Mr. Gall and Mr. Glaser elected to defer $125,000 and $235,613 of the STI 2021 award.

(3) These amounts are as of December 31, 2021 and do not take into account the amounts in the “Executive Contributions in Last Fiscal Year” column in the table above that are a deferral of the STI award for 2021, but were credited to Mr. Gall and Mr. Glaser’s accounts in 2022. The executive contributions included in this column of $108,317 for Mr. Gall and $256,730 for Mr. Glaser were previously reported in the Summary Compensation Table for 2019 and 2020.

In 2018, the Company adopted a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for its executive officers. The deferred compensation plan permits participants to defer salary or short-term incentive payments. Amounts deferred are deemed invested in investments selected by the participant from a limited number of choices available in the Company’s 401(k) plan. Aggregate earnings (losses) represents price appreciation (or depreciation) on the investments plus dividends or interest paid on investments.

Our STI Plan and form of restricted stock unit award agreement each contains a change-in-control provision. The employment agreement for Mr. Colo discussed above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Colo Employment Agreement” contains change-in-control provisions as well. Additionally, as noted in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of Compensation – Executive Severance Plan”, the Company’s executive officers participate in the MGP Ingredients, Inc. Executive Severance Plan, which provides the opportunity to receive severance benefits in the event of certain terminations of employment.

As discussed above, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Colo on February 7, 2020. Except in the event of a voluntary termination by Mr. Colo without good reason, termination by the Company with cause, or upon a termination at death or for disability, Mr. Colo will receive severance of (i) two times his base salary, (ii) pro-rata short-term incentive and long-term incentive awards based on actual performance for the full year in which the termination occurs, and (iii) the full-year short-term incentive and long-term incentive awards for any completed year unpaid as of the date of termination; provided, however, that a prior full year short-term incentive award is payable even in the event of a voluntary termination without good reason or a termination for cause. In addition, except in the event of a termination by the Company with cause, upon termination all outstanding restricted stock units that are then unvested will vest. Upon a termination for disability or death, Mr. Colo or his estate will receive severance of (i) one times his base salary, (ii) a pro-rata short-term incentive award based on actual performance for the full year in which the termination occurs and (iii) the full-year short-term incentive and long-term incentive awards for any completed year unpaid as of the date of termination.

•an applicable severance multiplier (one for any participant who is not the chief executive officer and two for any participant who is the chief executive officer) times the participant’s base salary in effect immediately prior to the date of the termination, which is paid in substantially equal installments over the one-year period following termination in accordance with the Company's normal payroll practices, beginning on the 61st day following termination; plus

The plan does not affect the terms of any outstanding equity awards. Any severance benefits payable to a participant under the plan would be reduced by any severance benefits to which the participant would otherwise be entitled under any other severance policy or plan, including any agreement between a participant and the Company (unless the plan or agreement expressly provides for severance benefits to be in addition to those provided under the plan).

Restricted stock units granted under the LTI Plan will generally vest over a period of not less than three (3) years from the date of grant of such award, provided that such award may vest earlier on a pro-rata basis over any vesting period. Upon the occurrence of a change in control (as defined in the LTI Plan) or upon the participant’s death or disability, any restricted stock units that have not previously vested will vest. Upon retirement at or after age 65, generally the award will vest, with the payment under the award made on the settlement date originally contemplated by the award agreement. Upon termination of employment or separation from service for any other reason, except to the extent specified in the applicable award agreement, any restricted stock units that have not previously vested shall be forfeited. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee may, in its sole discretion, waive such vesting requirement, or provide for continued vesting consistent with the vesting period in an award. However, it may not waive such requirement or continue such vesting to the extent such action would create adverse tax consequences for a participant under Code Section 409A. Generally, any award under the LTI Plan to a participant who has experienced a termination of employment, separation from service, or termination of some other service relationship with the Company and its affiliates may be canceled, accelerated, paid or continued, as provided in the applicable award agreement, or, as the Human Resources and Compensation Committee may otherwise determine to the extent not prohibited by the LTI Plan.

Under the terms of the STI Plan, if an executive officer’s employment terminates during a plan year other than due to disability or death, the executive officer forfeits any rights to an STI award. However, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee has the option to pay a prorated payment of short-term incentive compensation for the plan year if the termination is without cause or for good reason. Upon an executive officer's disability or death, the executive officer or his estate, is entitled to receive a pro-rata short-term incentive award based on actual performance for the full year in which the termination occurs, and the full-year short-term incentive award for any completed year unpaid as of the date of termination. Upon a change of control, the annual incentive plan terminates and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee will determine payments on an annualized basis, based on the Company’s performance through the most recently completed quarter for which financial results are available prior to the change of control. Incentive compensation will be paid on a pro-rata basis (measured through the end of such quarter) in accordance with the guidelines for payment of annual incentive compensation described in “Elements of Compensation – Incentive Compensation – Short Term Incentive Plan.” The Human Resources and Compensation Committee may elect to make a partial incentive compensation payment on the basis of estimated results before the end of the year. Payment is to be made in a lump sum as soon as feasible following the change in control, but in no event later than two and one-half months following the end of the plan year in which the change in control occurs.

In the event of death, the estate of each named executive officer, other than Mr. Bratcher who joined the Company mid-year and was ineligible in 2021, who has elected to receive additional life insurance coverage is entitled to receive a life insurance benefit of $500,000, which benefit is not included in the table below. Additionally, if any named executive officer, other than Mr. Bratcher, who was ineligible due to joining mid-year in 2021, is disabled, the named executive officer is entitled to a long-term disability benefit payment of $7,000 month, which is not included in the table below.

The following table sets forth amounts of compensation to be paid to each named executive officer in accordance with their respective employment agreement (in the case of Mr. Colo), RSU award agreements, the STI Plan and under the Executive Severance Plan in the event of a change of control or the named executive officer’s employment with the Company terminates as of December 31, 2021. Amounts shown are based on a price of $84.99 per share, the closing market price on December 31, 2021.


	Termination Value ($)
Name*	Retirement at or after Age 65 (1)	Termination without cause or resignation for good reason(2)($)		Change in Control Value (3)($)		Death or Disability Value (4) ($)
David J. Colo	—	$	6,804,261	$	3,692,297	$	4,377,397
Brandon M. Gall	—	832,407		1,860,239		1,860,239
David S. Bratcher	—	907,457		876,845		876,845
David E. Dykstra	—	674,710		1,166,442		1,166,442
Stephen J. Glaser	—	637,630		1,098,268		1,098,268

(2)Termination without cause or resignation for good reason: For named executive officers except Mr. Colo: 1x base salary plus, pro-rated short term incentive award (in this case, the full award since the date of termination is year-end), plus certain COBRA premium reimbursement for 6 months. For Mr. Colo: 2x base salary, full year 2021 short term incentive and long-term incentive awards, vesting of all outstanding equity awards, plus certain COBRA premium reimbursement for 24 months.

(4)Death/Disability: For named executive officers except Mr. Colo: vesting of unvested equity awards accelerated plus prorated 2021 short-term incentive award. For Mr. Colo: full year 2021 short-term incentive award, plus prorated 2021 long-term incentive award, plus 1x base salary, and vesting of unvested equity awards. Life insurance and long-term disability insurance benefits are described above and excluded from these totals.

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of Mr. Colo, our Chief Executive Officer. The paragraphs that follow describe our methodology and the resulting CEO Pay ratio.

As of December 31, 2021, the end of our fiscal year, we had approximately 595 U.S. employees and 72 non-U.S. employees. Approximately 331 employees from the Luxco acquisition, including 71 non-US. employees, were excluded from this year's determination (as permitted under SEC rules) as they were acquired partially through the fiscal year. Additionally, one non-U.S. employee was excluded from this year's determination (as permitted by SEC rules). We used total cash compensation, consisting of base pay, annual incentive compensation and Company contributions to retirement plans for the 12-month period from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021. We did not annualize compensation for permanent employees who did not work for the entire measurement period.

Once the median employee was identified for 2021, we calculated the median employee’s total annual compensation in accordance with the requirements of the Summary Compensation Table. Our median employee compensation as calculated using Summary Compensation Table requirements was $78,946. Our CEO’s compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table was $3,373,694. Therefore, we estimate that our CEO to median employee pay ratio is 43:1.

The pay ratio included in this information is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K. SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies and apply various assumptions. As a result, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable with the pay ratio that we have reported. A multitude of factors that could cause ratios to be less meaningful for company-to-company comparisons include the following, among others:

Members of the Board who are not Company employees (“Non-Employee Directors”) receive compensation for their service. Mr. Colo, our CEO, does not receive any compensation for his service as a member of the Board. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee annually reviews the total compensation of our Non-Employee Directors and each element of our Non-Employee Director compensation program. As part of this process, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee evaluates market data, including data provided by its independent compensation consulting firm, and makes a recommendation to the Board.


Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(1)(3)(4)		Common Stock (vested) ($)(2)(3)(4)		All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)
James L. Bareuther	$	30,867	$	7,633	$	—	$	38,500
Neha J. Clark	35,030		69,970		—		105,000
Terrence P. Dunn	66		38,434		—		38,500
Anthony P. Foglio	70,030		69,970		—		140,000
Thomas A. Gerke	19,319		89,181		—		108,500
Lynn M. Jenkins	14,046		20,954		—		35,000
Donn Lux	35,030		69,970		—		105,000
Lori L.S. Mingus	70,030		69,970		—		140,000
Kevin Rauckman	28,926		79,575		—		108,501
Karen L. Seaberg	179		189,821		—		190,000
Kerry A. Walsh Skelly	35,000		—		—		35,000
M. Jeannine Strandjord	84,030		69,970		—		154,000

(1)Employee directors do not receive any fees for attendance of any meeting of the Board of Directors. Directors elected other than at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders receive pro-rated compensation for their service. For 2021, non-employee directors received an annual retainer of $140,000 payable as follows: $70,000 in cash paid in quarterly installments (in advance at the election of the director) and $70,000 in restricted stock (which shall vest upon the election of the director). The chair of the Audit Committee was paid an additional retainer of $14,000, the chair of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee was paid an additional retainer of $7,000 and the chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee was paid an additional retainer of $7,000. The annual fee for serving as Chairman of the Board was $50,000.

(2)Pursuant to the Non-Employee Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan, on the first business day following the date of each Annual Meeting of stockholders, each non-employee director then-serving was awarded shares of restricted stock with a fair market value of $70,000, as determined on such first business day following the Annual Meeting. Fractional shares were paid in cash. The amount shown in the table is the grant date fair value of the awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Grant date fair value per share was assumed to be the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the grant date.

The following table sets forth, as of April 1, 2022, the number of shares beneficially owned and the percentage of ownership of the Company’s Preferred Stock and Common Stock by (i) each person who is known by the Company to own beneficially more than 5% of either class of the Company’s capital stock outstanding, (ii) each director and director nominee of the Company, (iii) each of the named executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table, and (iv) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group.


	Amount and nature of beneficial ownership (a)
Name of beneficial owner	Common Stock		Preferred Stock
	No. of Shares	%	No. of Shares	%
David S. Bratcher	—	*	—	—
Neha J. Clark	1,130	*	—	—
David J. Colo	14,818	*	—	—
David E. Dykstra	26,557	*	—	—
Anthony P. Foglio (b)	36,116	*	—	—
Brandon M. Gall	5,878	*	—	—
Thomas A. Gerke	1,383	*	—	—
Stephen J. Glaser	9,216	*	—	—
Donn Lux (c)	3,951,310	18.0	—	—
Lux Family Group (d)	5,020,331	22.8	—	—
Lori L.S. Mingus (e)	506,719	*	—	—
Kevin S. Rauckman	1,271	*	—	—
Karen L. Seaberg (f)	3,464,767	15.8	297	68.0
Todd B. Siwak	—	*	—	—
M. Jeannine Strandjord (g)	41,510	*	—	—
Preet H. Michelson	—	*	—	—
All executive officers and directors as a group ((16)(h))	8,060,675	36.7	297	68.0
Thomas Cray (i)	1,000	*	111	25.4
Champlain Investment Partners, LLC **	1,471,165	6.7	—	—
BlackRock, Inc. ***	2,137,023	9.7	—	—
Stephens Investment Management Group, LLC ****	1,232,322	5.6	—	—

**** Based on Schedule 13G filed on February 11, 2022, by Stephens Investment Management Group, LLC, Stephens Investment Holdings, LLC, Warren A. Stephens Trust UID 9/30/87 and Warren A. Stephens, each of the reporting persons listed a business address of 111 Center Street, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201. The Schedule 13G indicates sole voting power over 1,161,236 shares of the Company’s Common Stock and sole dispositive power over 1,232,322 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. Stephens Investment Management Group, LLC is an investment adviser. Stephens Investments Holdings LLC, Warren A. Stephens Trust UID 9/30/87 and Warren A. Stephens are a parent holding company or control person of Stephens Investment Management Group, LLC.

sole voting and investment power over the shares listed in the beneficial ownership table and all stockholders shown in the table as having beneficial ownership of 5% or more of either of the classes of stock had as a business address Cray Business Plaza, 100 Commercial Street, Atchison, Kansas 66002. Stockholders disclaim beneficial ownership in the shares described in the footnotes as being “held by” or “held for the benefit of” other persons.

(c)Donn S. Lux may be deemed to hold sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the 3,935,180 shares of Common Stock held by the Luxco 2017 Irrevocable Trust dated June 19, 2017, the Ann S. Lux 2005 Irrevocable Trust FBO Donn S. Lux dated September 16, 2005, the Ann S. Lux 2005 Irrevocable Trust FBO Donn S. Lux QSST LRD dated September 16, 2005, the Ann S. Lux 2005 Irrevocable Trust FBO Caroline Lux Kaplan dated September 16, 2005 and the Ann S. Lux 2005 Irrevocable Trust FBO Paul S. Lux dated September 16, 2005. Excludes 367,370 shares of Common Stock that may be deemed to be beneficially owned by Michele Lux, the spouse of Donn S. Lux. Michele Lux may be deemed to hold shared voting and dispositive power over 367,370 shares held by the Andrew Broddon Lux Luxco Irrevocable Trust dated July 30, 2012 and the Philip Donn Lux Luxco Irrevocable Trust dated July 30, 2012. Donn S. Lux disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of Common Stock that may be beneficially owned by his spouse. The Luxco 2017 Irrevocable Trust dated June 19, 2017, holds 1,763,771 shares of Common Stock. None of the other above referenced trusts holds more than 5% of the outstanding Common Stock of the Company.

(d)The following information is based on a Schedule 13D (the “Lux Family Schedule 13D”) filed on April 5, 2021 by (i) Luxco 2017 Irrevocable Trust dated 6/19/2017, (ii) Ann S. Lux 2005 Irrevocable Trust FBO Donn S. Lux dated 9/16/2005, (iii) Ann S. Lux 2005 Irrevocable Trust FBO Donn S. Lux QSST LRD dated 9/16/2005, (iv) Andrew Broddon Lux Luxco Irrevocable Trust dated 7/30/2012, (v) Philip Donn Lux Luxco Irrevocable Trust dated 7/30/2012, (vi) Caroline L. Kaplan Revocable Trust dated 12/16/2009, (vii) Ann S. Lux 2005 Irrevocable Trust FBO Caroline Lux Kaplan dated 9/16/2005, (viii) Ann S. Lux 2005 Irrevocable Trust FBO Catherine N. Lux dated 9/16/2005, (ix) CNL 2013 Irrevocable Trust dated 4/2/2013, (x) Ann S. Lux 2005 Irrevocable Trust FBO Paul S. Lux dated 9/16/2005, (xi) Lux Children Irrevocable Trust dated 5/24/2012, (xii) Donn S. Lux, (xiii) Leslie P. Lux, (xiv) Paul S. Lux, (xv) Michele B. Lux, (xvi) Christopher E. Erblich, (xvii) Caroline Lux Kaplan, (xviii) Catherine N. Lux and (xix) PandoTree Trust Company, LLC (“PandoTree”) (the foregoing trusts are collectively referred to as the “Lux Sellers” and all of the foregoing persons are referred to as the “Lux Family Group”) and any subsequent Form 4s filed with the SEC by members of the Lux Family Group. The business address of each member of the Lux Family Group, other than Christopher Erblich and PandoTree, is 5050 Kemper Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63139. The business address for Christopher Erblich is 5060 N. 40th Street, Suite 250, Phoenix, AZ 85018 and for PandoTree is 212 S. Main Avenue, Suite 145, Sioux Falls, SD 57104.

Pursuant to a Shareholders’ Agreement dated April 1, 2021 among the Company, the Lux Sellers, Karen Seaberg and Lori Mingus, the Lux Sellers have the right to nominate (i) two directors to the Company’s board of directors for so long as they continue to own at least 15% of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock, and (ii) one director to the Company’s board of directors for so long as they continue to own at least 10% but less than 15% of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock. Karen Seaberg and Lori Mingus have agreed to vote all of the shares of Common Stock that they beneficially own in favor of the election of the Lux Sellers’ director nominees. As a result of the entry into the Shareholders’ Agreement, each member of the Lux Family Group could be deemed to have shared voting power over the 3,927,032 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Karen Seaberg and Lori Mingus. Each member of the Lux Family Group disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of Common Stock held by Karen Seaberg and Lori Mingus.

(e)Includes 96 shares of Common Stock held by her spouse and 53,801 shares held in a trust over which Ms. Mingus has sole voting and dispositive power. Also includes 405,276 shares held by Seaberg MGP Holdings LP and 44,454 shares of Common Stock held by the Seaberg Family Foundation over which Ms. Mingus may be deemed to have shared voting and dispositive power (Ms. Mingus disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares of Common Stock except to the extent of her pecuniary interest therein). Excludes 79,082 shares that are held in trust for Ms. Mingus's benefit, but for which she does not have voting or dispositive powers and disclaims beneficial ownership.

(f)Includes 789 shares of Common Stock held directly, 90,856 shares of Common Stock in an IRA, 2,323,971 shares of Common Stock held by Cray MGP Holdings LP over which Ms. Seaberg has sole voting and dispositive power and 364,243 shares held in various trusts over which Ms. Seaberg has sole voting and dispositive power. Also includes 405,276 shares held by Seaberg MGP Holdings LP, 44,454 shares of Common Stock held by the Seaberg Family Foundation and 235,178 shares of Common Stock held by the Cloud & Sarah Cray Family Foundation over which Ms. Seaberg may be deemed to share voting and

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Company’s executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of the Company’s Common Stock, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Executive officers, directors and greater-than-10% beneficial owners are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based on a review of the copies of such forms furnished to the Company and the Company’s officers’ and directors’ written representations, the Company believes that during 2021, all required reports were filed except (i) one late Form 4 filing reporting one transaction for Ms. Seaberg, and (ii) one Form 4 for Michele Lux, a member of the Lux Family Group and the spouse of Donn Lux, reporting the grant of common stock to Donn Lux as part of his director fees, which transaction was timely reported in a Form 4 filed by Donn Lux.

None of the persons who served on the Company’s Human Resources and Compensation Committee during the last completed fiscal year: (i) was formerly an officer of the Company; (ii) during the last fiscal year, was an officer or employee of the Company; or (iii) had any relationship requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. None of the Company’s executive officers, during the last completed fiscal year, served as: (i) a member of the compensation committee of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on the Company’s Human Resources and Compensation Committee; (ii) a director of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on the Company’s Human Resources and Compensation Committee; or (iii) a member of the compensation committee of another entity, one of whose executive officers served as the Company’s director.

Written policies and procedures adopted by the Company's Audit Committee address its review of transactions that would or potentially would be transactions of more than $120,000 in which the Company's participates and in which any "related person" has a direct or indirect material interest. A "related person" is a director, executive officer, 5% or more stockholder, or immediate family member of any such person. The policies and procedures require our directors and executive officers to notify our Chief Executive Officer of the facts and circumstances of the transaction. If our Chief Executive Officer determines that the proposed transaction is a related person transaction as defined in the written policies and procedures, then the proposed transaction is submitted to the Audit Committee for consideration.

The policies and procedures prohibit interested Audit Committee members from participating in the review, consideration or approval of any transaction with respect to which such member is directly or indirectly the related person. The Audit Committee only approves those transactions that are in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, as the Audit Committee determines in good faith. Annually, the Audit Committee reviews any previously approved related person transaction that remains ongoing, to ensure that the transaction remains in, or is not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The Audit Committee has approved the transactions described below.

For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company paid $495,000 to lease real estate from Kemper Themis, LLC, a real estate entity owned 100% by Donn Lux, a member of the Company's board of directors and a member of the Lux Family Group, which owns approximately 22.8% percent of the Company. The terms of the lease were negotiated between the Company and Kemper Themis, LLC at arms-length prior to Donn Lux becoming affiliated with the Company.

For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company purchased $2.7 million of finished goods from Meier’s Wine Cellars, Inc. (“Meier’s”) and sold $2.4 million of bulk beverage alcohol to Meier’s. One member of the Lux Family Group has a relative that is the president of Meier's and, until January 2022, was the owner of Meier's. The members of the Lux Family Group did not have any involvement in the negotiation of transactions for either party.

We know of no other business that will be presented at the meeting. If any other matter properly comes before the stockholders for a vote at the meeting, however, the proxy holders will vote your shares in accordance with their best judgment. A proxy also confers discretionary authority on the persons named to approve minutes of last year’s Annual Meeting, to vote on matters incident to the conduct of the meeting and to vote on the election of any person as a director if a nominee herein named should decline or become unable to serve as a director for any reason.

Set forth below are the aggregate fees billed the Company by its principal accountant, KPMG LLP, for the years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 for (i) professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, the reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s reports on Form 10-Q during such year, procedures performed in connection with registration statements and the issuance of our convertible notes and professional services rendered in connection with acquisitions (“Audit Fees”), (ii) assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company financial statements but are not included in Audit Fees, including acquisition related due diligence (“Audit-Related Fees”), (iii) professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice or tax planning, including tax related due diligence for acquisitions (“Tax Fees”), and (iv) other products and services (“All Other Fees”).

The Audit Committee considers whether the provision of such services is compatible with maintaining the independence of its principal auditor. The Audit Committee has the sole right to engage and terminate the Company’s independent auditor, to pre-approve the performance of audit services and permitted non-audit services and to approve all audit and non-audit fees. The Audit Committee has empowered its chairman to act on the Committee’s behalf between meetings to approve permitted non-audit services; the chairman must report any such services to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee may provide for the pre-approval of services through the adoption of additional pre-approval policies and procedures, provided the policies and procedures are detailed as to the particular services, the Audit Committee is informed of each service and the procedures do not include delegation to management of audit committee responsibilities under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Audit Committee pre-approved of all services KPMG LLP rendered to the Company for 2021.

This proxy is being solicited by the Board of Directors of the Company. The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne directly by the Company. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, certain officers and employees of the Company, without extra compensation, may also solicit proxies personally or by telephone. Copies of proxy solicitation materials will be furnished to fiduciaries, custodians and brokerage houses for forwarding to the beneficial owners of shares held in their names. The Company will reimburse brokers, banks or other persons for reasonable expenses in sending proxy material to beneficial owners.

Including Stockholder Proposals in the 2023 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement. Stockholders who intend to present proposals for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act (“Rule 14a-8”) must forward them to the Company at Cray Business Plaza, 100 Commercial Street, P.O. Box 130, Atchison, Kansas 66002, Attention: Corporate Secretary, so that they are received on or before December 14, 2022. The proposal must comply with applicable securities regulations. In addition, proxies solicited by management may confer discretionary authority to vote on matters which are not included in the proxy statement but which are raised at the Annual Meeting by stockholders.

Stockholder Proposals Presented at the 2023 Annual Meeting. With respect to stockholder proposals to be presented at the 2023 Annual Meeting that are not intended to be included in our proxy statement relating to that meeting, pursuant to the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), a stockholder’s written notice of such proposal, in the form specified in the Bylaws, must be delivered to or mailed and received at our principal executive offices no earlier than January 26, 2023 and no later than February 25, 2023. Pursuant to Rule 14a-4(c)(1) promulgated under the Exchange Act, the Company’s management will have discretionary authority to vote on any matter of which the Company does not receive notice of by February 25, 2023, with respect to proxies submitted for the 2023 Annual Meeting of the Company’s stockholders.

Stockholder Director Nominations. Pursuant to the Bylaws, in order to nominate persons for election to the Board of Directors at the 2023 Annual Meeting of the Company’s stockholders, a stockholder must deliver notice of the intention to submit nominations at the meeting, in the form specified in the Bylaws, to the Secretary of the Company no earlier than January 26, 2023 and no later than February 25, 2023.

Only one copy of the Company’s Notice, and if applicable, our annual report (as amended) and the Proxy Statement, has been sent to multiple stockholders of the Company who share the same address and last name, unless the Company has received contrary instructions from one or more of those stockholders. This procedure is referred to as “householding.” In addition, the Company has been notified that certain intermediaries, i.e., brokers or banks, will household proxy materials. The Company will deliver promptly and free of charge, upon oral or written request, a separate copy of the Notice, and if applicable, annual report (as amended) and Proxy Statement, to any stockholder at the same address. If you wish to receive a separate copy of the Notice, annual report (as amended) and Proxy Statement, free of charge, you may write to the Corporate Secretary of the Company at MGP Ingredients, Inc., Cray Business Plaza, 100 Commercial Street, P.O. Box 130, Atchison, Kansas 66002 or call the Corporate Secretary at 913-367-1480. You can contact your broker or bank to make a similar request. Stockholders sharing an address who now receive multiple copies of the proxy materials may request delivery of a single copy by writing or calling the Company at the above address or by contacting their broker or bank, provided they have determined to household proxy materials.

The Company’s policy is to ask directors to attend the Annual Meeting of stockholders, and all of the directors attended last year’s Annual Meeting. Stockholders may communicate directly with Board members by writing the Board or individual Board members in care of the Company’s Secretary at the Company’s executive offices. Letters should be addressed as follows: Name of director - In care of Corporate Secretary - MGP Ingredients, Inc. – Cray Business Plaza, 100 Commercial Street, P.O. Box 130 - Atchison, Kansas 66002.


	Weighting		Minimum Payout 50%		Plan Payout 100%		Maximum Payout 200%
Operating Income	70	%	$	54,241	$	59,665	$	65,089
EBITDA	20	%	69,562		74,008		80,410
Earnings per share	10	%	2.29		2.53		2.77


M. Jeannine Strandjord (Chair)
Neha J. Clark
Anthony P. Foglio
Thomas A. Gerke
Kevin S. Rauckman


Thomas A. Gerke (Chair)
Neha J. Clark
Lori L.S. Mingus
Kevin S. Rauckman
Karen L. Seaberg
M. Jeannine Strandjord


Named Executive Officer	2020 Base Salary ($)		2021 Base Salary ($)		Increase
David J. Colo	$	650,000	$	685,100	5	%
Brandon M. Gall	315,000		375,000		19	%
David S. Bratcher(1)	N/A		453,000		N/A
David E. Dykstra	323,000		332,690		3	%
Stephen J. Glaser	305,000		314,150		3	%


	2/10/2022
		Grant
	# of	date fair
Participant	RSUs	value($)
David J. Colo	22,020	$	1,712,716
Brandon M. Gall	6,268	487,525
David S. Bratcher	5,679	441,713
David E. Dykstra	5,561	432,535
Stephen J. Glaser	5,251	408,423


	Stock Awards
Name	Number of shares acquired on vesting (#)	Value realized on vesting ($)(1)
David J. Colo	—	—
Brandon M. Gall	576	$	37,198
David S. Bratcher	—	—
David E. Dykstra	2,446	$	157,963
Stephen J. Glaser	2,272	$	146,726


Type of Fee	Amount
	2021		2020
Audit Fees	$	1,652,361	$	887,000
Audit-Related Fees	160,000		724,372
Tax Fees	—		22,035
All Other Fees	—		—
Total	$	1,812,361	$	1,633,407